[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: orion-list radiocarbon
On Sat, 21 Aug 1999 20:35:37 EDT, RGmyrken@aol.com writes:
>
> Having read Greg Doudna's radiocarbon articles, and having read Jull's
>post with great interest, I do not see how Jull's informative post could
>fairly be taken to refute Doudna's observations or theories. As a
>generality, Jull said that data points should not be excluded due to some
>special hypothesis, but this comment was not made with reference to Doudna,
>as Goranson insinuates, nor is this something Doudna has done with his
>radiocarbon dating in his carefully researched and thought-provoking
>articles. I don't think Goranson's characterizations of Jull's post are fair
>or accurate or add to the discussion.
>
> Russell Gmirkin
I agree totally.
Tom Simms
>> > Greg Doudna has repeatedly told the orion list that
>> >AMS experts agree with his presentation of the Qumran
>> >tests. Now that a leading expert, in fact, reads the
>> >evidence differently, Greg persists in efforts to justify
>> >his other hypothesis.
For private reply, e-mail to Tom Simms <tsimms@mailserv.nbnet.nb.ca>
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from Orion, e-mail to majordomo@panda.mscc.huji.ac.il with
the message: "unsubscribe Orion." For more information on the Orion Center
or for Orion archives, visit our web site http://orion.mscc.huji.ac.il.