Re: orion-list radiocarbon; [63-31/20]

[Dierk van den Berg <haGalil@gmx.net>]

    [The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set]
    [Your display is set for the "ISO-8859-8" character set]
    [Some characters may be displayed incorrectly]

David wrote

> Shouldn't 63 BCE be termed the terminus a quo and therefore, from the
> presence of historical references, be taken as the earliest date at which
> the deposits could have taken place? <

That's it...

Dierk

For private reply, e-mail to "Dierk van den Berg" <haGalil@gmx.net>
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from Orion, e-mail to majordomo@panda.mscc.huji.ac.il with
the message: "unsubscribe Orion." For more information on the Orion Center
or for Orion archives, visit our web site http://orion.mscc.huji.ac.il.

---

• Prev by Date: RE: orion-list radiocarbon/63
• Next by Date: orion-list Tetragram and scribes
• Prev by thread: orion-list radiocarbon/63
• Next by thread: orion-list Tetragram and scribes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread