[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: orion Solinus, Dio, Pliny, M. Agrippa
Russell Gmirkin misrepresented my post and made some quite
speculative assertions about sources, mixed in with some intelligent
observations. I have no time today to attempt detailed disentangling.
My post on Strabo vis-a-vis the Qumran Essene texts was described,
in part, with false representation.
That Pliny used M. Agrippa more than the times he cites his name is
well known and demonstrated in Pliny literature.
The statement "This passage [in Strabo] appears to represent the
sum total that Posidonius wrote on the Jews" is puzzling indeed. How does
Russell Gmirkin know, or assume he knows? Essenes from the times 1 and 2
Maccabees (with "Hasidim") were written, and earlier, inconvenience his
theory; these he resists. But how to know the sum total of what Posidonius
wrote on the Jews!? What a handy method of dismissal.
Best wishes,
Stephen Goranson
goranson@duke.edu
On Russell Gmirkin's post which begins:
> Steven Goranson tries [....]
- Prev by Date:
Re: orion Solinus, Dio, Pliny, M. Agrippa
- Next by Date:
Re: orion Solinus, Dio, Pliny, M. Agrippa
- Prev by thread:
Re: orion Solinus, Dio, Pliny, M. Agrippa
- Next by thread:
Re: orion Solinus, Dio, Pliny, M. Agrippa
- Index(es):