[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Essenes, again.
Not unless you are barbara Thiering and reading these e-mail comments.I
think that it is important to debate all the issues-only the future will
judge who got it right and who came close and who was way off beam but
interesting nevertheless.Actually maybe we will never know,but just
entertain each other with interesting ideas and theories.Cheers jim veitch
>>>>>Maybe B. Thiering was right?
>>>I thought the Thiering word was banned in all academic discussion! A joke
>>>in very bad taste, I would imagine.
>>That's a sexist remark. A clear example of patriarcal dominance. :) <
>>I think we all know that Thiering's work is discounted for reasons having
>>NOTHING to do with her gender!
>Oh, Judith, not so serious.
>Have a good Shabbos.
> | /\ | |
> | ____/_ \____ | |
> | \ ___\ \ / | |
> | \/ / \/ / | Moshe Shulman |
> | / /\__/_/\ | email@example.com |
> | /__\ \_____\ | |
> | \ / | |
> | \/ | |
Religious Studies Department
PO Box 600
Phone (Work) : (64)-(4)-471-5394
Personal Fax : (64)-(4)-471-5394
Department Fax : (64)-(4)-495-5065
Home (Phone) : (64)-(4)-476-9490
Home Fax : (64)-(4)-476-9491
E-Mail : Jim.Veitch@vuw.ac.nz