Re: One Thousand Scribes

[Martin Abegg <martin_abegg@mindlink.bc.ca>]

    [The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set]
    [Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set]
    [Some characters may be displayed incorrectly]

>>4Q259 and 4Q319 (or the same ms?)
>                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Yes, sure the separation is artifical. The fragments of 4QS^e (=4Q259)
>continue on PAM 43.283 (missing in Charlesworth´s edition) and belong to the
>same column as 4QOtot (=4Q319). The existence of a calendar-section in this
>position, where 1QS 9,26 - 10 has the section of the "appointed times", is
>of great interest for the history of the Community Rule(/s).
>
>Greetings,
>UWE

Uwe:

Just to be clear, isn't it true that no one fragment contains text from
both 'works'?

Marty

Martin Abegg
Director, Dead Sea Scrolls Institute
Trinity Western University

---

• Prev by Date: Re: One Thousand Scribes
• Next by Date: Re: One Thousand Scribes
• Prev by thread: Re: One Thousand Scribes
• Next by thread: Re: One Thousand Scribes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread