[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

4Q104

To: orion@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il
Subject: 4Q104
From: Jim West <jwest@SunBelt.Net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 11:06:53 -0400 (EDT)

Friends,

I am working on 4Q104 (PAM 41.299) (Ruth 1:1-10) and note that, so far as I
can tell from the photo I have, that in line 2 "Moab" is somewhat unclear.
In fact, all I can see is mem (something) aleph.  In line 4 of the text Moab
is fully written out.  So far as I can see in line 2, there is no room for
the final beth, and there is no inidication that it was ever there.  So I am
wondering if someone can help explain why Moab (if it is indeed Moab) is
spelled without  beth in line 2.

Thanks,


Jim West

Prev by Date: Allegro Qumran fiche - opinions please
Next by Date: Re: 4Q104
Prev by thread: Allegro Qumran fiche - opinions please
Next by thread: Re: 4Q104
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread